Family background and returns to education

Education is widely seen as benefitting individuals in terms of their economic life prospects. But do all benefit equally from education? This project examined this question, focusing on differences across social background and across periods in the development of the Danish welfare state.

THE PROJECT IS COMPLETED.

Lecture. Photo: Jakob Dall
Photo: Jakob Dall

(See Danish summary below)

The project examined how the labor market returns to schooling varies across social background and whether this pattern in the returns to schooling had changed with the rise of the comprehensive Danish welfare state.

The project was based on data from virtually all twins born in Denmark from 1931 through 1979. The project tested the hypothesis that over time social background should play less of a role in determining the labor market benefits that people reap from education. The project expected to provide new insights into the way we think about education as a promoter of social mobility.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The project’s empirical design was based on identical (monozygotic) twins and is known as “twin fixed effects models” in the research literature. The project used the identical twins to gauge the labor market returns to completing a given level of education. Identical twins share all of their genetic make-up and also their upbringing environment. For this reason, we would expect twins to be very similar in terms of their education attainment and labor market outcomes. Given these considerations, the basic idea of the empirical design was the following: If two identical twins obtain different levels of education and the one with the better labor market outcome is the one with the highest level of education, then we can attribute their different labor market outcomes to their difference in schooling – and not to common confounders such as shared genetic makeup or shared upbringing environment. This conclusion depends on some assumptions, and the project pursues different ways of validating these assumptions.

 

 

 

 

International forskning viser, at den sociale arv i uddannelse er blevet mindre i løbet af de sidste 50 år i en række europæiske lande. Resultatet tyder på, at de store uddannelsesreformer, som har karakteriseret denne periode, har givet arbejderklassens børn bedre muligheder for at få sig en uddannelse. Et uafklaret spørgsmål i forskningslitteraturen er imidlertid, om arbejderklassens børn får et lige så stort afkast på arbejdsmarkedet af at tage en uddannelse som middelklassens børn. Hvis arbejderklassens børn får mindre ud af at tage en uddannelse, har de store uddannelsesreformer måske ikke formået at skabe mere social mobilitet i samfundet. Projektet undersøgte på den baggrund, om afkastet af at tage samme uddannelse varierer med socialt ophav, samt om dette mønster har ændret sig i løbet af et halvt århundrede i Danmark. Projektets empiriske analyse baserede sig på over 30.000 tvillingepar, som er født i perioden 1931-1979. Datamaterialet gav en enestående mulighed for at estimere afkastet af uddannelse og samtidig studere, hvordan afkastet varierede med socialt ophav og over forskellige fødselskohorter. Projektets resultater forventes at udfordre den udbredte forståelse af, at uddannelse er den primære nøgle til at fremme den sociale mobilitet i de vestlige demokratier.

Du kan læse en nyhed om projektet her.

 

 

 

Researchers

Name Title Phone E-mail
Search in Name Search in Title Search in Phone

Funded by:

Independent Research Fund Denmark

The project was funded by the Independent Research Fund Denmark (Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond)

Project: Family background and returns to education
Period:  2018-2022

Contact

Kristian Bernt Karlson (PI)
Department of Sociology
Mail: kbk@soc.ku.dk
Telefon: 35 32 15 88

External members:

Name
The Danish Twin Registry